News from Berlin
An Interview with H.E. Amb. Ruth Jacoby, Ambassador of Sweden to Germany
March 16th, 2010
H.E. Amb. Ruth Jacoby
Ambassador of Sweden to Germany
News from Berlin. Ruth Jacoby was born during 1949 in New York and has been the Ambassador of Sweden to Germany since 2006. Jacoby began working for the State Department in 1972 and she has previously served on the OECD Delegation in Paris from 1980-1984, the Ministry of Finance from 1989-1990, as undersecretary at the Ministry of Commerce’s Department during 1990-1994, the World Bank in Washington for three years until 1997 and as the head of the Ministry’s Department for Global Cooperation from 1998 to 1999. For three years after this, Jacoby was the Ambassador at the Swedish Delegation to the UN until 2002 where she led preparations for the development conference in Monterrey, after this she was appointed Foreign Affairs with responsibility for development issues until 2006 where Jacoby became Ambassador of Sweden to Germany.
News from Berlin.
An Interview with H.E. Amb. Ruth Jacoby, Ambassador or Sweden to Germany
Interview conducted by James Lionel Hood
Do you have an opinion on any particular cultural distinctions that might account for different approaches to both causes and coping in the current financial crisis?
Germany, for example, has always been financially prudent country. The people have painful memories of inflation, and so they are sensible in their spending and consumption. This is a history that many countries do not share, so of course this creates a different approach.
Looking to the global financial framework of the future, how confident are you of reaching an international agreement?
You know, it’s going to be difficult because we all face the same difficulties. We have to ensure that we will continue working together and not go our separate ways in relation to either emerging or transatlantic economies. That is why the G20 is such an important forum where we can reach a consensus on how to tackle these challenges we face.
What is your opinion of the automotive industries bailout: do you consider it political protectionism or economic necessity?
I hope it is not protectionism; it shouldn’t be. I think at times it may be an economic necessity. In my country, we have tried not to bail out the car companies for the simple reason that we do not agree with economic protectionism, but obviously one does wants to ensure employment. However, there are many ways of doing that. There can be long-term structural options which may prove more effective or efficient than trying to save an industry that is no longer competitive — that is the challenge. We want to save jobs, but they need to be sustainable for the future, as we have traditionally done over the last few decades across various industries. You cannot ensure long-term sustainability not only because it becomes a terrible drain on the government’s financial resources, but also delays structural adjustment.